A serious error in this type of reliability between boards is that the random agreement does not take into account and overestimates the level of agreement. This is the main reason why the percentage of consent should not be used for scientific work (i.e. doctoral theses or scientific publications). The field in which you work determines the acceptable level of agreement. If it is a sporting competition, you can accept a 60% agreement to nominate a winner. However, if you look at the data from oncologists who choose to take a treatment, you need a much higher agreement – more than 90%. In general, more than 75% are considered acceptable in most areas. When calculating the percentage agreement, you must determine the percentage of the difference between two digits. This value can be useful if you want to show the difference between two percentage numbers. Scientists can use the two-digit percentage agreement to show the percentage of the relationship between the different results.

When calculating the percentage difference, you have to take the difference in values, divide it by the average of the two values, and then multiply that number of times 100. If you have multiple advisors, calculate the percentage agreement as follows: The basic measure for Inter-Rater`s reliability is a percentage agreement between advisors. With this tool, you can easily calculate the degree of agreement between two judges during the selection of studies to be included in a meta-analysis. Fill the fields to get the gross percentage of the chord and the value of Cohens Kappa. Multiply the quotient value by 100 to get the percentage parity for the equation. You can also move the decimal place to the right two places, which offers the same value as multiplying by 100. If you want to calculate z.B. the match percentage between the numbers five and three, take five minus three to get the value of two for the meter. As you can probably tell, calculating percentage agreements for more than a handful of advisors can quickly become tedious. For example, if you had 6 judges, you would have 16 pairs of pairs to calculate for each participant (use our combination calculator to find out how many pairs you would get for multiple judges). 34 themes have been identified.

All Kappa coefficients were assessed on the basis of the directive described by Landis and Koch (1977), with the power of Kappa coefficients (0.01-0.20) being slight; 0.21-0.40 Fair; 0.41-0.60 moderate; 0.61-0.80 significant; 0.81-1.00 almost perfect, according to Landis-Koch (1977). Of the 34 subjects, 11 had a fair agreement, 5 had a moderate agreement, four had a substantial agreement and four subjects had almost perfect agreement. Kappa is always smaller or equal to 1. A value of 1 implies a perfect match and values below 1 mean less than a perfect match. In this competition, the judges agreed on 3 out of 5 points. The approval percentage is 3/5 – 60%.